By M. Isi Eromosele
Change is a constant, a thread woven into the fabric of our
personal and professional lives.
Change occurs within our world and beyond, in national and
international events, in the physical environment, in the way organizations are
structured and conduct their business, in political and socioeconomic problems
and solutions, and in societal norms and values.
As the world becomes more complex and increasingly
interconnected, changes seemingly far away affect us. Thus, change may
sometimes appear to occur frequently and randomly. We are slowly becoming aware
of how connected we are to one another and to our bigger world.
Organizations must be aware of their holistic nature and of
the ways their members affect one another. The incredible amount of change has
forced individuals and organizations to see the big picture and to be aware of
how events affect them and vice versa.
Organizational development is a relatively new area of
interest for business and the professions. While the professional development
of individuals has been accepted and fostered by a number of organizations for
some time, there is still ambiguity surrounding the term organizational
development.
The basic concept of both professional development and
organizational development is the same, however, with an essential difference
in focus.
Professional development attempts to improve an individual’s
effectiveness in practice, while organizational development focuses on ways to
improve an organization’s overall productivity, human fulfillment and responsiveness
to the environment.
These goals are accomplished through a variety of interventions
aimed at dealing with specific issues, as well as through ongoing processes.
Change In Organizations
Organizational development efforts, whether facilitated by
an outside expert or institutionalized and conducted on an ongoing basis, bring
about planned change within organizations and teams.
However, they are but one type of change that occurs in
organizations, for change can be both planned and unplanned and can occur in
every dimension of the universe. A change in the head of a company can
dramatically alter the character of an organization.
Organizational realignment of a company’s strategies,
operations and methods may yield similar impacts. Change will not occur unless
the need for change is critical.
Because individuals and organizations usually resist change,
they typically do not embrace change unless they absolutely have to.
Planning For Change
Before embarking on an organizational change initiative, it
is wise to carefully plan strategies and anticipate potential problems. One
useful method of planning comes from using the concept of force-field
analysis. The term describes analysis that is deceptively simple and can be
used to help plan and manage organizational change.
Behavior within an organization is a result of the dynamic
balance of two opposing forces. Change would only occur when the balance
shifted between these forces. Driving
forces are those forces which positively affect and enhance the desired
change. They may be persons, trends, resources, or information.
Opposing them are the restraining forces, which
represent the obstacles to the desired change. As these two sets of forces
exist within an organization, they create a certain equilibrium. That is, if
the weights of the driving and restraining forces are relatively equal, then the
organization will remain static.
As changes occur and affect the weight of either one of the
two forces, a new balance will occur and the organization will return to what
is called “quasi-stationary equilibrium.” Individuals practicing their vocation
in the context of the organization may
intuitively employ these concepts in defining and redefining
what change is possible.
What is the usefulness of this perspective? Force-field
analysis assists in planning in two major ways: (1) as a way for individuals to
scan their organizational context, brainstorming and predicting potential
changes in the environment; and (2) as a tool for implementing change.
In the former, force field analysis becomes a method
of environmental scanning (which is useful in strategic planning), whereby
organizations keep abreast of impending and potential changes from societal
trends and potential budget constraints to staff turnover and purchases of new
office equipment.
The more change can be anticipated, the better individuals
and organizations are prepared to deal with the resulting effects. The second
use of force-field analysis is similar, offering a way to systematically
examine the potential resources that can be brought to bear on organizational
change and the restraining forces that can be anticipated. This advance
planning and analysis assists in developing strategies to implement the
desired change.
M. Isi Eromosele is the President |
Chief Executive Officer | Executive Creative Director of Oseme Group - Oseme Creative | Oseme Consulting | Oseme Finance
Copyright Control © 2012 Oseme Group
0 comments:
Post a Comment